Friday, October 17, 2008

RAP AND LESS-MUSICAL MUSIC

RAP AND LESS-MUSICAL MUSIC

Adherents to rap and other less-musical forms of music prefer lyrics, rhythm and repetition to traditional music. Their format emphasizes words more than melody, and they seek to persuade others that the content is emphasized more in this effort. Others who may not be so easily persuaded that traditional music has “seen its day” and can no longer be relied upon to dispense a message respond that rap and other less-musical forms rely more on repetition and shock-value to deliver the message. Rapsters and less-musical artists of every conceivable persuasion insist that traditional music lulls one into an apathetic posture-of-indifference that misses a vital ingredient of communication—the message itself. In other words, the meaning of the lyrics is lost in the beauty of the music. Those who promote less-sing-able songs and rhythmic/repetitious sounds would have us believe that there can be no common ground between these two opposing factions. Many churches have abandoned traditional music completely, in favor of its less-musical counterparts in hopes of attracting younger, more contemporary worshippers. Does any common ground exist between these two factions, or are we doomed to alienating traditionalists from these less-musical versions? Should the drumbeat of vocal and percussive repetition be allowed to silence beautiful harmonies forever? I respond that silence is oftentimes preferred to disharmony.

Mark Overt Skilbred

NATIONAL VS. PRIVATE SINS: Twisted Theology and Misusing Our Bodies

(In this election, remember that voting for Barack Obama is a vote for abortion and homosexuality! Barack Obama votes against all legislation that tends to undermine Roe v. Wade—even partial-birth abortions, late-term abortions and children who live despite attempts to abort them! He supports abortion for any reason whatsoever! Let’s vote for McCain/Palin and overturn Roe v. Wade! Let’s pass an amendment to the constitution making marriage between a man and a woman the only legally recognized partnership, and making all homosexual relationships immoral and illegal!)

NATIONAL vs. PRIVATE SINS: Twisted Theology and Misusing Our Bodies

I love the line from the musical, Fiddler On The Roof, which says, “Send us the cure! We’ve already got the disease! God has already given us the cure—repentance! The result of the misappropriation of our desires and bodily functions results in disease and functional loss in the human family. Haven’t we realized that all of God’s laws are designed to promote and restore life? When we sin and fall short of God’s Divine plans, we rob ourselves of the perfection that living in harmony with God’s Laws provides. We settle for less than God’s best for us, and in so-doing set bad examples for those who follow after us. When our children follow our sinful lead, this becomes a generational problem that leads us farther from the path of life and light. Abortion destroys life, and homosexuality distorts our desires and normal bodily functions, to our own detriment. Whenever we deny God’s Laws in favor of our own desires, we risk punishment and death. “A kingdom divided against itself cannot stand,” and we as individuals and nations ignore this Biblical principle at our own peril. National governments are appointed by God to uphold the Laws which He has given to us in the Bible and through His Holy Spirit. Some non-Christian governments actually do a better job of upholding God’s Laws than so-called “christian nations”. Some non-Christian nations can still be under the power and influence of God’s Holy Spirit, which prompts them to obey God and His Laws. When we see that God’s Laws are not being upheld, it is our duty to warn those in power of their disobedience to God and His Laws. God is no respecter of persons, and He will punish all of us for our disobedience. We are not doing the world and our governments a favor when we refuse to warn them of their folly. All who live within these disobedient nations suffer as a result of the government’s disobedience and dereliction of duty. God will punish the judges, senators, representatives, presidents, dictators, kings, counselors and rulers of every stripe who refuse to uphold and enforce His Laws! Even if the majority favors disobedience to God’s Laws, we as Christians “must obey God rather than men.” THERE ARE THOSE WHO THINK THAT THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE MEANS THAT WE ARE FREE TO BE IMMORAL. THERE IS A VAST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATIONAL AND INDIVIDUAL SIN. INDIVIDUALS MUST BEAR THEIR GUILT AND PUNISHMENT INDIVIDUALLY, BUT SINFUL NATIONAL POLICIES DESTROY WHOLE CIVILIZATIONS! WHEN OUR NATION’S LEADERSHIP PASSES LAWS THAT PERMIT ABORTION AND HOMOSEXUALITY, GOD’S JUDGMENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE SURE TO FOLLOW! We cannot ignore the divisive issues of abortion and homosexuality. We must deal with these sins individually and as a nation. Our avoidance of these issues is our tacit approval of their existence. God will NOT ignore these issues, but will punish us individually AND as nations, for refusing to denounce these practices. Until recently, abortion and homosexuality were closet issues. That is because these practices were not only immoral, but they were illegal. Here’s a question for you: Since abortion and homosexuality have come out of the closet, has there been an increase or decrease in abortion and homosexuality? There have now been nearly 50 million documented cases of abortion since Roe v. Wade, and homosexuality has resulted in the pandemic of AIDS. It is often stated that women will still have abortions no matter what laws are passed. In the same way, the argument is made that prohibition won’t stop homosexuality. Nevertheless, by passing laws that make abortion equal to murder and homosexuality immoral and illegal, we uphold God’s standards and establish a legal framework for the morality of our nation. Before women have abortions and people engage in homosexual relationships, they are first given warning by the Laws of God and the laws of our nation that engaging in these practices is immoral, illegal and will be punished. Then if these individuals decide to disobey God’s Laws and the laws of our nation, then God and the nation are free from guilt when these individuals are punished. They have done what is required and warned them to stop doing evil. Here’s something else that I have noticed: Since abortion and homosexuality came out of the closet, other immoralities have skyrocketed as well! It is no coincidence that murder, rape, adultery, witchcraft and many other forms of criminal behavior have increased exponentially. THERE IS A PATTERN HERE THAT WARNS OF AN ENORMOUS BREAKDOWN IN MORALITY. Abortion and homosexuality are the crack in the dike, which have now become a river of dissipation. WHERE ARE OUR LEADERS? Have you noticed that those who support abortion and homosexuality are not silent about their views? They are proud of their beliefs and proud of their leaders. Are we ashamed of our Christianity and of our God, Who gave us His Laws to protect us from self-destruction? Do you really believe that these two issues are the only tests we will face as Christians? God has warned us in the Bible of what we can expect to happen in the final days. If we as Christians, citizens and voters in a Christian nation cannot even pass this rudimentary test, what will happen when the real testing begins? If we deny our faith now, we will JOIN the enemy later! We must prepare now to battle the forces of Satan that are arrayed against us. We are not alone, and with God’s help we can overcome not only these immediate dangers, but other future dangers as well, if we are willing to choose God rather than men. Let us unite as Christian brothers and sisters with one voice in opposition to these grievous sins. Let’s stand up for God and His Laws and show the world that our God and His Laws are not to be ignored. Why are so many silent on this issue? Do they fear men more than the God Who made us all? We Christians have eternal life to look forward to, as well as the reassurance of the Holy Spirit Who dwells within us, and yet we act as though our primary loyalty belongs to the sinful societies wherein we dwell. WHERE ARE OUR CHRISTIAN POLITICIANS? WHERE ARE OUR CHURCHES AND PASTORS? WHY ARE OUR PULPITS SO SILENT ON THESE PRESSING ISSUES? God’s prophets proclaimed His Laws and His judgments loudly and boldly enough for all to hear, whether they listened or not. The church leadership of some denominations has actually denounced Biblical doctrine openly and denied the faith of those who protest otherwise. They have expelled some leaders for upholding the faith and denied admission to those who do not conform to their twisted theologies. God will judge these leaders and denominations more severely for their disobedience and for teaching others to deny the faith. We think that we are showing solidarity by remaining silent and refusing to oppose these rebellious factions to their face. Instead we are actually allowing a cancer to spread through the church. God reserves some of His harshest criticisms for those in church leadership. He says of them that “it were better that a millstone were hung about their necks and they were drowned in the depths of the sea, than that they should cause one of these little ones to perish.” I really wonder if they are still teaching the Bible in some of today’s seminaries! Answer me this: What sort of perverted theology would say that God permits abortion and homosexuality? I fear for these shepherds who refuse to warn their flocks about their sins, and instead they themselves become the wolves that devour the sheep they are told to protect. God will hold all of us guilty of the blood-death of those that we fail to warn of their sins. “He who knows to do good, and doesn’t do it,” is guilty before God, but especially those in church leadership. Pastors and denominations are not the only ones responsible for allowing the sins of abortion and homosexuality to be spread unopposed. Some would have us believe that confrontation is unloving and actually worse than the sins we oppose, because it spreads disharmony and discourages church membership. It has been well-said that “those who stand for everything will fall for anything!” Who would want to be a part of such a church? Why not just turn church into a social club and skip all the pretensions of holiness: “Come one, come all—there are no conditions for membership, either now or later. Enter into this wide gate that leads to destruction—at least you’ll have lots of company!” Those who are familiar with the writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer will recall that he and a few other German pastors formed an underground church that fought against Hitler’s ungodly and totalitarian Nazi regime. He was eventually hanged for his efforts, but not before reminding his readers that “when Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die” to himself for the sake of God’s Kingdom. God is watching our struggles and making note of our loyalties and devotion to His Truths. I am only a layman, but I have read my Bible for many years, and I know that God is calling us to be faithful witnesses to His Truths found in scripture and revealed to us through His Holy Spirit. If our pastors refuse to denounce abortion and homosexuality, in favor of less-controversial topics, then it is up to the rest of us Christians, “who have less to lose,” by stating our beliefs loudly and clearly enough to be understood by those who are perishing all around us. May God help us all to do our Christian duty as good and faithful soldiers in His army and help us to repent of our sinful ways and return to the reading and practice of God’s Word and the enactment of our faith in our everyday walk. “By ourselves we can do nothing, but we can do all things through Christ, who strengthens us.”

Mark Overt Skilbred-Christensen

SCANDINAVIAN AND AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT: The Island of Hispaniola

SCANDINAVIAN POVERTY? (Background Information)

I was curious if there was poverty in Scandinavia, because it has now been exactly 31 years since I visited there, and I don’t recall seeing any evidence. My grandfather Overt Skilbred came to the United States from Norway in his early twenties and his wife was a second-generation Norwegian-American from Iowa. My mother’s father, Martin Christensen was a second-generation Danish-American from Minnesota and his wife Christine was a second-generation Norwegian-American, also from Minnesota, although they met in North Dakota, where they raised their family of 15 children. I traveled through Denmark, Sweden and Norway in September and October of 1977, having just spent the prior four years working on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline project. I was impressed with the peoples and lands of my origin, and met several Finnish citizens in Germany and Sweden who greatly impressed me with their intelligence and character. I also met an Icelandic citizen in Oslo who was very cosmopolitan and urbane. It appears that the Scandinavian economies are strong and supportive of their citizens. We in the United States could learn a lot by studying the Scandinavian cultures and attempting to emulate their systems of governance.

SCANDINAVIAN AND AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT: The Island of Hispaniola

I realize that the Scandinavian cultures are ancient civilizations which have made wise use of their time in strengthening and developing themselves into economic and social powerhouses. As young and developing nations, the North Americans would do well to model themselves after the Scandinavians. Indeed, the whole world could profit through closer partnerships with Scandinavia, especially when considering social and economic development and human rights. For example, what if Scandinavia and North America were to partner with the island of Hispaniola in the development of the two nations who currently share that island? The Dominican Republic and Haiti have been hit hard by successive hurricanes of economic, social and political origin. This could serve as a test-case in regional and world development. Those nations who are still struggling with social and economic issues would be watching this experiment with great interest and desire that partnerships of this nature could be implemented in their nations. When the costs of the project are spread out among the nations of Scandinavia and North America and the longer-term economic benefits to trade and tourism are added into the equation, I believe that the advantages not only outweigh the risks, but could serve as a template for future development projects.

Mark Overt Skilbred-Christensen

COME ON MCCAIN/PALIN!

COME ON MCCAIN/PALIN!

Let’s take it to the Democrats over the issues of abortion and homosexuality! We have nothing to lose and a great deal to gain! Let’s stand up and be counted! Let’s be remembered as the party who defended the rights of the unborn, who have no other way of defending themselves! Let’s be remembered as the party who confronted homosexuals with the truth about their immorality! God is on our side! Be strong and courageous!

Mark Overt Skilbred-Christensen

LET'S TALK ABOUT MORALITY!

ELECTION 2008: LET’S TALK ABOUT MORALITY!

The economy and political missteps are the most common topics of the day, partly because of their perceived urgency, and also for their generally non-moral nature. By avoiding morality issues, John McCain and Sarah Palin are missing an opportunity to appeal to the broad base of support which is generated by morality issues among Republicans and other Christian voters. Voters need to hear from McCain/Palin that this Republican platform rests on a solid bedrock of Christian morality. Let’s take off the gloves and drive a wedge right down the middle of the fence that uncommitted voters and unconvinced Christians are sitting on. We can catch the liberals napping while we provide convincing evidence that a vote for McCain/Palin is a vote for morality. I know that John and Sarah are on the right side of this issue and will provide the moral leadership that our country needs. The problem is that the voters need to HEAR them declare their moral positions LOUDLY and CLEARLY! What we will discover by doing this properly, is that the Democrats are UNWILLING and UNABLE to respond effectively to a frontal attack on these moral issues, because their foundation is built on the sandy soil of compromise which reveals a humanistic and self-centered approach to life, rather than a God-centered reality. Let’s hit them hard and fast on the issues of abortion and homosexuality and watch them fall off that perch they have been sitting on. Let’s watch them as they struggle to defend their moral positions based on their own situational ethics, rather than on God’s Unchanging Word! Time is running out for those who want to sidestep and compromise on morality. Let’s show the Democrats and the rest of the world that the Republican Party of the United States of America is willing to take a stand for morality in this election!

Mark Overt Skilbred-Christensen

THE HEART OF THE MATTER

McCain/Palin: THE HEART OF THE MATTER

Did anyone else hear the interview with Hillary Clinton today? She was asked by the reporter about the progress being made by the Democrats in this election in light of the economic downturn. Her response was to lump gun control and abortion into the same phrase, as being of lesser importance than the broader issue of the economy. This is the heart of the matter for Christians. Liberals want us all to place less emphasis on morality and to focus more on the economy and other mistakes in judgment by the previous administration. When will people wake up and realize that God’s Laws are THE issue in this election and any other election that we face. There may be other important issues, such as the economy, which demand our attention, but ultimately, what will decide our fate as a nation are issues of morality, such as our responses to abortion and homosexuality. Let’s not allow our politicians to sideline the most important moral issues of our time. Let’s not let them sweep these issues under the carpet of the latest fiscal crisis. God cares very much about the moral issues of our day, and about the concern that we have to uphold the morality of our nation. Vote McCain/Palin!

Mark Overt Skilbred-Christensen

SOCIOLOGICAL REFORM: What's It All About?

SOCIOLOGICAL REFORM: What’s It All About?

All governments deal with sociological breakdown in varying degrees. Those who choose to respond to negative challenges with a positive plan-of-action have begun to properly address concerns that plague individuals and society as a whole. These include poverty, illiteracy, disease, crime, environmental degradation, dysfunctional homes, alcohol and drug problems, substandard educational practices, poor communication, inadequate housing, mental illness, prejudice, segregation, racism, caste-systems, age and gender discrimination, lack of opportunity, disabilities, handicaps, lack of infrastructure, etc. Those societies which recognize the importance of solving these shortcomings and begin to promote the prevention, treatment, cure and safeguarding of those areas which are most at-risk and implement programs with ambitious short-and-long-term goals whose timetables and fulfillments can be accomplished, have discovered that by building a strong foundation of prevention, and proactively reaching into the community to correct the shortcomings before they spiral out-of-control, stand the best chance of maintaining the equilibrium that describes a vibrant society. Those who have experienced the benefits of living in a harmonious culture are reluctant to slip back into dysfunctional systems. Government intervention is necessary to guide and aid those in leadership roles whose suggestions and implementations satisfy the requirements and provide solutions for the social problems being addressed. The planners, architects, teachers, engineers, counselors and technicians who accomplish this shaping process are greatly aided by having observed other successful models such as job training and placement, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, mental health clinics, counseling programs, education, health evaluations, job corps programs, intervention in economically depressed communities where job losses due to changes in supply and demand or environmental degradation have been a part of job-loss and health and safety issues, proactive family counseling, bilingual education programs, judicial intervention when required to prevent discrimination and the entrenchment of vested-interests and class-warfare, to promote equal opportunity for all races and classes, regardless of disabilities, backgrounds and limitations associated with poor infrastructure and other shortcomings, alcohol and drug programs which are based on top-down education and prevention, as well as bottom-to-top intervention and rehabilitation, health programs that emphasize wellness, discipline and long-range health maintenance, etc. Every nation has certain individuals and sometimes large numbers of exemplary individuals who have achieved high standards of excellence in many areas. These individuals are best prepared, with the governments’ help, to furnish the templates needed to bring about the changes in education and the accomplishment of sociological advancement. Why is it that a country like the United States has such enormous and ongoing problems with poverty, homelessness, illiteracy, unemployment, drug and alcohol abuse, crime, sexual addiction and perversion, mental illness, lack of sufficient education, deterioration of overall health and well-being, apathy, malaise and the downward-spiral of quality-of-life issues, generally? There is an overall feeling that things are not as good as they once were, and that they are getting worse-by-the-minute. Everyone wants the government or SOMEONE ELSE to step up and solve these pressing issues, and no one seems to think themselves or anyone else capable of accomplishing the task. Here’s a great question for all of you procrastinators out there: How much longer should we wait before we start doing something about it? Shall we wait until we all experience another great depression? How about our own version of a Bolshevik Revolution? You do realize that it is much easier, cheaper and quicker to solve our social problems before they start, than wait until the whole world has noticed and demands an improvement? Well I, for one, do not believe that things are so hopelessly out-of-control that we should just drop-out, give-up, move to another country, or crawl-under-a-rock until things improve! We can begin, like any family, by addressing the chief concerns in a meaningful way, by having a round-table discussion for the purpose of prioritization and strategic planning. We say that these goals are too lofty and unreachable, when we haven’t taken the first step toward solution! This country was built by pioneers who had experienced failure, hardship and lack of opportunity in other countries, and who were determined that their children would have a better life with more opportunities here. Maybe what is lacking is that pioneer spirit which sacrifices comfort and convenience for the hard work and determination which is necessary to move us to the next level. Don’t tell me that this is impossible, when there are other countries that have solved a large portion of these sociological problems in-part or in-full. What we lack is the willingness to act. The conceit and buck-passing reminds me of Nero playing his harp while Rome burned. Oh, there will be lots of finger-pointing, when and if our country collapses, with no one willing to take the blame for allowing it to happen. Is anyone else concerned about all of this, or have you all gone to sleep, convinced that there is nothing more that can be done? Wake up! Let’s get organized and convince others to do the same. Don’t give up without a fight! This is our life, this is our country, and this is our time to make the most of every opportunity to improve our nation and set a good example for other nations. If we can’t get the job done, then we should get out of the way and let some other country shoulder the burden. Let’s just give up, and let some other country tell us how to live a proper existence. Let’s just give up and sit in our own stink, until we all get depressed and move somewhere else. Does this sound familiar? It should, because this is exactly the situation most of our relatives faced before they moved here! So why have we given up on our country? Don’t we have the means to improve it? Doesn’t our humanity have within it the same seed that enabled our forebears to build the nation we inherited? Why have we given up the dream and pursuit of excellence? Is life only about self-fulfillment? “Are we meant to get more than we give?” as the song says, “What’s it all about?” Come on! This isn’t good enough! We can do a better job here! We have to stop settling for less-than-the-best with our social problems. We need to pitch-in and help solve these problems while we still can, before we all move away, or are overrun by our betters! Are we a nation of has-beens, content with yesterday’s accomplishments, or will we discover a way to respond to these sociological concerns that will create a conscientious and enduring example for our children and world-neighbors? Let us decide that WE are the “someone else” that needs to approach these problems proactively, in a way that prevents their occurrence in the first place and treats their symptoms effectively and promptly. The sooner we get started, the more-likely we are to achieve our aim of a harmonious and beneficial society.

Mark Overt Skilbred

THE AMERICANS

THE AMERICANS

Why do nations south of the U.S. border harbor grievances toward their North American counterparts? Do they perceive a haughty attitude that is unwilling to cooperate with them in the development of their nations? Why do some of these nations refuse to dialogue and exchange diplomatic relations? Is it because they perceive that we disregard their interests in favor of our own? Must every agreement heavily favor U.S. interests and largely ignore the health and interests of those who live south of our U.S. borders? If this has been our policy, at what point can these nations who share our Western Hemisphere look forward to mutual benefit? If the U.S. desires a friendly neighborhood, then it must begin by being a good neighbor. No one likes a bully, and if our policies have tended to compromise the integrity of our neighbors to the south, then we need to begin fresh dialogues that consider the needs of our partners, and not just our own. Let us renew those relationships which show the most promise, and welcome suggestions for how to develop and strengthen our other partnerships. We cannot expect other nations who share our hemisphere and the world around us to respond favorably to one-sided agreements which give one partner unfair advantages and offer the other partners very little in return. If what we offer is little-more than survival-benefits without long-term partnership considerations, it is no wonder that our promises and dialogues are largely ignored! If the European Union unequally rewarded its member nations, it would soon lose its credibility and strength. We should learn from those unions which have proven their ability to prosper and endure and accept their diplomatic advice when it is offered. No one expects the unification of the Americas to happen anytime soon, but we can promote the development of inclusive dialogue by suggesting ways in which we can mutually benefit from our relationships. Why should other global regional-partnerships achieve such remarkable success in their trade relations, while the Western Hemisphere struggles to survive? Do our European and Far-Eastern neighbors have goods and services to offer that we in the West do not? We are being outmaneuvered in our own backyard! If we refuse to develop our own neighborhood, we encourage other nations to do it for us, on THEIR terms. The United Nations was established in the West because the world relied on us for leadership at a time when former global templates had dissolved. It’s time that we begin to unite with our world partners instead of persisting with our go-it-alone mentality. The urgency of responding to the events of 9-11 created a perception in the eyes of some that our world partners could no longer be relied upon for guidance and support. Perhaps we should revisit that perception long enough to recall that these same partnerships have endured the test of time for many generations. In addition, we in the West have formed other strategic relationships in the Far East that require patient nurturing so that the seeds of global cooperation can mature. The Americans, like any other global-partnership, can only be as strong as their weakest link. We need to examine the relationships we have in our own hemisphere before we can promote diplomacy in any meaningful way in the global community. Let’s encourage each other to be more willing to help than to offend, more ready to develop than to be enriched ourselves. We can show the world that Americans are united in goodwill and dedicated to the success of our Western Hemisphere. If we treat others as we would like to be treated, others will respond in-kind, and reciprocate with diplomacy that is worthy of the name. Some would argue that our creative manipulation of the Monroe Doctrine has resulted in damaged relationships that are too broken to mend. There is no time like the present to discover the cracks that need mending and resolve to perform the needed repairs. Some of our southern neighbors are in need of a great deal more than charity can provide if they are to be brought into the 21st century. Should we watch silently while others make the necessary investments in infrastructure with our American neighbors, and be content only to make commentaries on the latest political and economic developments south-of-the border, or should we proactively seek to be instrumental in guiding and shaping this development? This marathon of diplomatic effort in the Americas is in need of a fresh infusion of hope and determination from both the public and private sectors in order to respond effectively to all of the educational and developmental requirements. Rather than developing the Americas from afar, our policies must include a blueprint of inclusiveness that establishes southern leadership positions where they are able to influence and determine paths-of-development for their future. Corporate America is ideally positioned to share both decision-making and developmental strategies with their counterparts in the south. This strategy will come as welcome news to those who struggle to overcome the perception of non-inclusiveness in the present diplomatic formula. When we approach our neighbors with a developmental plan that includes them in the decision-making process as real partners who enable their own transformation, we enlist their cooperation to realize its actualization. When we perceive that our relations with some partners have been damaged either by our own policy errors, or as a result of misperceptions caused by forces within or without their own borders, our response must persuade using the most attractive and inclusive strategies which we are able to provide. When our southern neighbors realize that we, as Americans working together, can truly accomplish changes that will empower and uplift our Western Hemisphere, they will be less likely to engage in primary relations with another hemisphere. The best guarantee for our reluctant partners that diplomacy with us will yield results, is the success of our neighboring partnerships. We will experience other global economic challenges in the future which require strategic partnerships similar to that of the European Union. Let’s not be caught unprepared for the next crisis, but instead prepare our hemisphere for the requirements needed to prosper in the new millennium. Our inevitable struggles equip us for the eventual challenges we face in the global community. Our union strengthens our leverage and impact with other world communities. Does the West still possess the formula and the ingredients for success? Can we motivate others in our own hemisphere and those of like-minds throughout the world, that our methods are correct, practical and transformational? Is it true that following the model we provide will help our global partners to succeed? We have led by example in the 20th century, and I believe that we can inspire the Western Hemisphere and the world to respond to our example and follow us into this new millennium. In order to accomplish this, we must first trust each other enough to cooperate in the relationships that will transform the West. As a cohesive unit, we can present a united and compelling hemisphere to our global neighbors. Good governance must supply the blueprint and the leadership necessary for success. We have the manpower, energy and diplomatic willingness to accomplish the unification of our Western Hemisphere. Let’s not let policy failures and short-sightedness deter us from accomplishing the union that we seek. Our failure at this task will only encourage others to attempt what we have failed, and result in further diversions and delays to our eventual unification process. It is inevitable that we will either work together in goodwill and harmony, or settle for yesterday’s uneasy alliances and postponed dreams. Let’s make plans now to create a Western Hemisphere and world where all of us can participate equally and enjoy the benefits of our shared cooperation.

Mark Overt Skilbred

OUR PLACE IN THE WORLD

OUR PLACE IN THE WORLD

Shall we follow or shall we lead? There are those who do not welcome the changes of the 21st century. For some, the good-old-days summon up familiar memories of a time when boundaries were clearly drawn and positions were firmly held. We had problems and we had solutions for those problems, and as time progressed, we made plans for our futures based on historical events. How has our perception changed toward this pattern, as we feel our way forward into this new century? Are the old alliances working, or do we allow larger, better, more inclusive and appropriate agreements to take their place? Is it practical to use a 20th century template to solve 21st century problems? Many are reluctant to lead, fearing to take those steps which mark change, and fearing to sponsor those who do. For some, the cold-war mentality has scarred their outlook to the point that all gestures of cooperation towards others are viewed in a hostile light. Olive-branch diplomacy risks accusations of pandering, weakness, and traitorism. Others proclaim that a new millennium has begun, full of opportunities that must not be squandered through policies of non-inclusiveness and fear-mongering. From what viewpoint do we choose to obtain our world perspective? As individuals, we understand and embrace those technologies and policies which enhance our lives and move us forward. As countries, we recognize those who are most adept at promoting solutions and setting good examples for others to follow. Cooperation between those who lead by good example magnifies the effect of the results and encourages further partnerships. The world of change begins at our doorsteps, and leads to many other changes that are developing all around us. How we choose to respond to these invitations and opportunities defines us as individuals, nations and humanity. Should we wait, while others shoulder the responsibilities of leadership? Should we be reluctant participants, who respond only to events that we perceive as intrusive and harmful to our established standards? Or should we establish a new-millennium diplomacy which seeks common agreement on issues that affect and benefit us all? Adoption has shown us how individuals can be changed through a healthier family and social environment. I believe that every human on our planet would benefit from adoption into a new global family, which can supply the ingredients which are lacking in our separate lives. Enlarging our view-of-the-world to include a full spectrum of nations united in purpose and direction will continue this process of education and social development that will enrich and enable succeeding generations to develop and encourage each other. Instead of an “us vs. them” mentality, which pits nation-against-nation, and presumes that only one nation is capable of deciding what is beneficial for all, why not acknowledge our differences and move beyond them to create bridges that unite us in our common endeavors? Perhaps we will discover that there truly are more issues that we agree on, than those which divide us. The rich tapestry of our humanity must be woven with the skill of united effort, less-mindful of our differences, and more-thoughtful of our shared aspirations. We realize that certain individuals are wonderfully gifted in some areas, and yet depend on others to supply those talents and energies which they lack. When we consider the world, this same principle must be acknowledged and promoted so that equal opportunity is offered to everyone to develop the talents that God made uniquely theirs. Who knows how many bright minds and able bodies have been exempted through policies of non-inclusion and denied opportunity? When these barriers are allowed to continue, we only cheat ourselves and our earth of the innovations and industry that would result from inclusion. “A mind is a terrible thing to waste,” and so is the human energy that depends on a beneficial and humane society for its development. We feed our animals and water our plants, but we deny our fellow humans the ingredients they so desperately need for a successful life. Shame on those of us who lead and follow, who selfishly put humanity in jeopardy and deny the dreams and accomplishments of those who are potentially our betters, through policies which deny entrance and opportunity to all but the “chosen few.” We can do better than this, and we must! We must begin to view everyone as a part of our world family, and no longer just as separate individuals and nations. I have faith that when we cooperate with each other, and promote the general welfare and advancement of all of our neighbors, that our entire planet will benefit. Our earth and its inhabitants are depending upon our united efforts to accomplish this transformation. Selfish ambitions must defer to those policies which enable every person to succeed. Yesterday’s political categories no longer suffice to bring about these changes. Our new family must decide that we prefer unity to individual desires. Should our individual wishes deprive others of their dreams? Consider how many countries have risen to power in the past, only to fall victim to the axiom that “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely!” How many countries bitterly regret that their power was not kept in check by the voices of moderation who pleaded with leadership not to plunge themselves and their nations headlong in the pursuit of global domination? Their power was wasted in the destructive efforts of wars which only increased suffering and deprivation in their own countries and in the world around them. Instead of being a force for leadership and peace, they became perpetrators of greed and violence who sowed the seeds of disharmony and hatred that we carry with us to this day. We need leadership NOW, more than ever, that is willing to put the general welfare of every individual and political entity on the planet ahead of their own selfish desires. Does this world need to be a “dog-eat-dog” kind of reality? Are there really a lack of abundant resources available, or have we refused to do what families are supposed to do—share? As individuals, we each contribute our efforts to our family, so that our family can move forward together and accomplish what we as individuals might never achieve. Let us as individuals, embrace our world-wide human family in this same way, and help each other to develop individually, so that we can move forward together as one WHOLE family. In this process, we will discover that our own happiness depends more on helping others than it does on helping ourselves. Let us move toward leadership by example, promoting those who prove their willingness to sacrifice their own power and wealth for the greater good of all, and trusting that the One God Who made us all will provide the skill to accomplish this great task.

Mark Overt Skilbred